Ibn Sı̄nā and conflict in logic
نویسنده
چکیده
During the 1020s Ibn Sı̄nā wrote a commentary in Arabic on the logical works of Aristotle, as part of his encyclopedia Al-Šifā’ (The Cure). The commentary runs to some 2180 pages in the recent Cairo edition; this figure includes his commentary Madk ̄ al on Porphyry’s Eisagōgē, which he counted as an introduction to Aristotle’s work. Apart from the Madk ̄ al which was translated into Latin in the 12th century, and the section of Qiyās dealing with propositional logic, barely any of Ibn Sı̄nā’s commentary has been translated into any western language. Ibn Sı̄nā refers to Aristotle’s texts as ‘The First Teaching’ (as in [2.5.7], [2.5.9] below). Their first five books are the subjects of the second to sixth volumes of the Šifā’ respectively. After Madk ̄ al which comments on the Eisagōgē, there comeMaqūlāt (onAristotle’sCategories), cIbāra (on Perı̀ Hermēneı́as), Qiyās (on Prior Analytics), Burhān (on Posterior Analytics) and Jadal (on Topics). Ibn Sı̄nā also commented on the Sophistical Refutations, Rhetoric and Poetics, but we won’t use these commentaries. We will cite two later works of Ibn Sı̄nā: the Easterners and the ’Išārāt.
منابع مشابه
Ibn Sı̄nā on analysis: 1. Proof search. Or: Abstract State Machines as a tool for history of logic
State Machines as a tool for
متن کاملThe grammar of meanings in Ibn Sı̄nā and Frege
I thank Manuela Giolfo, Ahmad Hasnaoui, Amirouche Moktefi, Zia Movahed and Kees Versteegh for information, corrections and comments that relate directly to things discussed below. I should also thank Kais Dukes of the Arabic Language Computing group at Leeds University, who sent me some very useful information before going silent — I hope I didn’t make myself a nuisance to him. None of these pe...
متن کاملAffirmative and negative in Ibn Sı̄nā
Aristotle in his Categories 10, 13a37ff, De Interpretatione 4f, 17a8–37; 10, 19b5– 20b12 and Prior Analytics i.2, 25a1–13; i.46, 51b5–52b35 introduced a distinction between affirmative and negative (kataphátikos and apophátikos, or in noun form katáphasis and apóphasis). Aristotle’s views are not my concern here. But already Aristotle’s treatment of the notions raises some fundamental questions:
متن کاملA Critical Examination of Ibn-Sina’s Theory of the Conditional Syllogism
This paper will examine Ibn Sina’s theory of the Conditional Syllogism from a purely logical point of view, and will lay bare the principles he adopted for founding his theory, and the reason why the newly introduced part of his logic remained undeveloped and eventually was removed from the texts of logic in the later Islamic tradition. As a preliminary discussion, this paper briefly examines I...
متن کاملIbn Sı̄nā on patterns of proofs
This section 9.3 of Ibn Sı̄nā’s Qiyās is a commentary on sections 25 and 26 of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics i, pages 41b36–43a19. NB the parallel passage in Ibn Sı̄nā’s Burhān iii.2, p. 136ff (Badawi). The paper below is what Wikipedia would call a stub. I will add and correct as time allows. I make the paper available now because it contains a complete translation of Qiyās section 9.3, which is a...
متن کامل